← All posts
8 min read

How to Analyze a Competitor's ASO Strategy

Analyze competitor keywords, rankings, metadata, screenshots, and country gaps, then turn the research into a focused App Store test.

Orange dithered binoculars for App Store competitor analysis

Competitor ASO analysis should end with a short list of changes you can defend. If it ends with an export of 500 keywords, the research is not finished.

Frame the research around one question:

Which searches bring this competitor visibility, and where does my app have a realistic opening?

That shift matters. A large competitor can rank for a broad term because it has years of download history, thousands of ratings, and a familiar brand. Putting the same term in your subtitle will not transfer any of that strength to your app.

The workflow below turns competitor data into a practical ASO test rather than a copy-and-paste exercise.

Choose one leader and one reachable competitor

Start with two apps.

The category leader shows how the market is framed. Its name, screenshots, and keyword coverage reveal the promises that users already recognize.

The reachable competitor matters more for your next update. Pick an app with a similar audience, rating count, business model, or level of traction. If that app ranks for a relevant search, you have stronger evidence that the result page is not reserved for the biggest brand in the category.

Avoid building the first list from every vaguely related app. Five close competitors are more useful than fifty apps that happen to share a category.

If you are not sure which apps deserve attention, the free app revenue checker can help you compare rounded download and revenue ranges before you open the deeper workflow.

Start from a search intent

Open the analysis with one job your user is trying to get done.

For a sleep app, that might be "fall asleep faster" rather than the entire Health & Fitness category. For a photo app, it could be "remove an object from a picture" rather than the word "editor".

This keeps the research honest. You are looking for apps that compete for the same user decision, even when their feature lists are different.

Write down:

  • The problem the user wants solved.
  • The broad category term.
  • A few specific ways people might describe the result.
  • The countries where you can support and monetize those users.

Then use App Store keyword research to turn those seed ideas into searches you can check.

Inspect the result page, not one app in isolation

A competitor ranking tells you where it appears. The whole result page tells you why the search may be difficult.

For each promising keyword, inspect the top apps and ask:

SignalWhat it tells you
App relevanceWhether Apple is matching the search to the same use case you had in mind
Rating volumeWhether the result page is dominated by established apps
Similar app sizesWhether apps near your stage can enter the top results
Repeated wordingWhich promises users are likely to recognize in this category
Country differencesWhether the same search is more open in another market
Product page qualityWhether screenshots and positioning are likely helping conversion

One small app in the top ten can be more informative than the brand at number one. It proves the result page has at least one route that does not depend on category dominance.

Do not assume every repeated word is a ranking factor. Apple confirms that an app can be searchable by its name, subtitle, keywords, and company name, but it does not publish an exact weighting formula. Treat exact ranking-factor claims with caution.

Build a keyword gap you can actually use

A competitor keyword gap is a relevant search where another app ranks and yours does not.

That definition is deliberately strict. A gap is not useful merely because the competitor appears for it.

Score each candidate on four questions:

  1. Does the term describe something the app genuinely does?
  2. Is there enough demand to justify metadata space?
  3. Can an app of your current strength compete on the result page?
  4. Does the search fit a country you care about?

Keep the answers simple. A small working table is enough:

KeywordRelevanceDemandResult-page strengthDecision
Broad category termHighHighDominated by large appsTrack, but do not lead with it yet
Specific outcomeHighMediumSeveral reachable appsTest in visible metadata
Adjacent featureMediumMediumMixedKeep for later research
Unrelated popular termLowHighIrrelevantReject

The rejected terms are part of the work. They stop a popular competitor from pulling your metadata away from the product you actually built.

Compare visible metadata and screenshots

You cannot see a competitor's private keyword field. You can see its app name, subtitle, category, screenshots, description, ratings, and the searches where it appears.

Read those elements together.

If the app ranks for "sleep sounds" and the first screenshot promises "fall asleep with calming audio," the search intent and conversion message support each other. If the metadata mentions sleep but the screenshots focus on a generic audio player, the listing may be winning visibility while leaving room for a clearer product page.

Look for:

  • The outcome stated in the subtitle.
  • The promise made by the first three screenshots.
  • Features competitors explain repeatedly.
  • Important use cases that nobody explains well.
  • Wording that changes between countries.

The goal is to understand the user's comparison, not to reproduce another app's sentences.

Check the same competitors by country

The App Store is not one global result page.

A keyword can be crowded in the United States and far more open in France or Brazil. The same competitor may rank well in one storefront and disappear in another. Local wording, ratings, download momentum, and product-page quality all change the picture.

Use country opportunity analysis to compare the same search across markets. A smaller country with clear demand and weaker competitors may be a better first localization test than the biggest market on your spreadsheet.

This is also where literal translation breaks down. Research what people search in each market instead of translating the English keyword list word for word.

Turn the research into one controlled update

Competitor research becomes useful when it changes a decision.

Choose a small group of related terms around one intent. Decide which term deserves the app name or subtitle, then place supporting words in the keyword field without unnecessary repetition.

Before the update:

  • Save your current rankings for the terms being changed.
  • Record the metadata version and date.
  • Note the countries affected.
  • Keep unrelated screenshots and product changes out of the test when possible.

After Apple reflects the new metadata, use keyword rank tracking to watch the terms in each country. App Store Connect can then show whether impressions, product page views, conversion rate, and downloads moved during the same period.

A ranking increase is evidence that the app became more visible for the search you targeted. Use acquisition data before crediting the metadata with the resulting downloads.

Use Apple Search Ads when organic feedback is too slow

Paid search can test intent before an organic ranking arrives.

Run a small exact-match Apple Search Ads test for a keyword that survived the competitor review. Watch whether the search produces taps, installs, trials, and revenue. A term that looks attractive in competitor data may still bring the wrong users for your app.

Paid results do not guarantee an organic ranking. They can tell you whether the underlying search deserves more attention.

If you already connect revenue, the keyword ROAS guide explains how to judge a search after trials and subscriptions have had time to mature.

Common competitor-analysis mistakes

Copying the category leader

The leader may rank because of brand demand, download volume, or years of history. Use it to understand the category. Use reachable peers to find the next move.

Treating every ranking as a keyword choice

You cannot know every field or signal behind another app's position. Rankings are evidence of visibility, not a copy of its private metadata.

Ignoring country context

A global-looking report can hide the most realistic opportunity. Track rankings and competitors in the storefront where you plan to act.

Collecting gaps without rejecting any

More keywords do not make a better strategy. Relevance and a realistic result page should remove most of the first list.

Changing too much at once

If you replace the title, subtitle, keyword field, screenshots, pricing, and onboarding in the same week, the result may improve while teaching you very little.

A weekly competitor workflow

You do not need to audit the whole category every Monday.

Use a lighter review:

  1. Check the rankings of a few direct competitors.
  2. Inspect new terms where a reachable app entered the top results.
  3. Save relevant gaps and reject the rest.
  4. Compare the best candidates by country.
  5. Move one coherent group into the next metadata test.

That is enough to keep the research current without turning ASO into a full-time reporting job.

What to do next

Pick one category leader and one competitor close to your current size. Compare the searches they rank for in your main country, then keep only the terms that fit your product and have a result page you can plausibly enter.

Analyze competitor keywords in AppSprint, then move the strongest gaps into keyword research, metadata, and rank tracking without changing tools.

Sources

Research, analyze, optimize

Find the right keywords, study the competitors already earning attention, and turn that into a stronger App Store page.

Available for macOS 14.6 and above

AppSprint developer 1AppSprint developer 2AppSprint developer 3AppSprint developer 4AppSprint developer 5AppSprint developer 6AppSprint developer 7AppSprint developer 8

Loved by 544 users

Related articles

See all posts →